On January 31st, the French authorities opened an investigation into the
practices of two pharmaceutical companies - Glaxo SmithKline and Sanofi Pasteur.
At the same time, a French judge began an investigation for manslaughter against
Sanofi Pasteur1.
The investigations are centered around a campaign by the two companies to
vaccinate children against Hepatitis B (HBV) between 1994 and 1998. There have
been allegations that the companies did not fully disclose the side effects of
the vaccine. During this period of time, nearly two thirds of the French public,
and routinely all newborn babies, were given the HBV vaccine.
What is particularly surprising is that while this action was reported on
February 1st 2008 on Reuters, a search of both the BBC and the CNN websites did
not show that it was being reported at all. Why is it that employees from two of
the world's largest pharmaceutical companies are being investigated for
manslaughter but there is no mention of it on these websites?
What do we know about HBV and the vaccination for this disease? First, we know
that HBV is a blood borne virus. It can only be contracted through sexual
intercourse and blood transmission. This means that a newborn baby or a child is
at extremely low risk of contracting the disease unless they are having a blood
transfusion in a country where blood is not routinely tested for viruses,
or their mother is positive for Hepatitis B.
Secondly, we know that, for low risk groups, the vaccine does not appear to
provide long term protection. In one study it was found that only 1 in 10
children aged 5-7, who had been vaccinated at birth, still had antibodies
against HBV2.
Thirdly, we know that 90% of people exposed to HBV will develop an acute
infection and then recover after a few months, while for the remaining 10% they
will have chronic HBV and become carriers. 15-20% of those with chronic HBV will
die of complications associated with the disease. This means that for every 100
people who are infected with HBV, 90 will recover, 10 will become chronic HBV
carriers, and 1-3 people will die of HBV related complications.
Finally, we do not know what the true risk of contracting HBV is for any
particular individual. Certain practices significantly increase the risk of
acquiring the disease such as intravenous drug use, unprotected sex and blood
transfusions if the blood is not tested for HBV. However, for a healthy,
non-drug user, who is not having unprotected sex, we do not know the risk. The
overall risk within the population of the USA is 5%. This is a skewed statistic
though since it includes prostitutes and drug users who are at significantly
increased risk, and infants who are at almost no risk.
It will be interesting to follow this case and see how it proceeds. Will
pharmaceutical companies be held accountable for injury and death that the
families involved believe were caused by the vaccine? Or will it be determined
that there is no evidence that the vaccine is unsafe?
References
-
French
judges probe firms over vaccinations, Reuters, Online:
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/
idUSL0173467120080201, retrieved February 5th 2008.
-
Petersen,
K.M. et al., 2004. Duration of Hepatitis B Immunity in Low Risk
Children Receiving Hepatitis B Vaccinations from Birth. Journal
of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 23(7),650-655.
|
Childbirth International's take on
researchWe often see comments on
the latest research reported on news websites,
magazines and the various lists and discussion
forums related to childbirth. What is
challenging for a birth professional is
determining how good the research was and
whether it is adding anything to the literature
about evidence-based care in pregnancy, birth
and parenting.It
appears that journalists may report on the
latest research using the abstract or the press
release as the sole source of information. The
problem with this is that the abstract is not
always showing all the information that was
gleaned from a study, or may be skewed towards
what the authors were hoping to find.
News is often taken from
organizations like Reuters. Again, this is a
brief overview of the research, intended to
highlight the most relevant points. Critical
information about risks and complications may be
left out.
Generally these news
briefings do not provide any information on the
number of people in a study and the methods used
when the study was carried out. Nor do they
usually mention any potential bias from the
authors of the study, for example when a study
author has financial interests that may be
affected by the study results.
Childbirth International aims
to highlight the issues related to some of the
latest research and examine some of the relevant
issues, enabling you to help your clients find
their way through the maze of options available
to them and understand evidence-based care.
For more information on
training with Childbirth International, take a
look at our
website,
or
contact us.
Childbirth International
offers training programs for Birth Doulas,
Postpartum Doulas and
Childbirth Educators. From September 2008 we will
also be launching a Breastfeeding Counseling
course. |